Guyana vs Ukraine: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Guyana
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 0.5092 kt against 0.4885 kt in Guyana, a difference of 0.0207 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Guyana ranks 58th and Ukraine ranks 56th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.9 kt | 1.37 kt | 0.5357 kt | Guyana |
| 2000s | 0.3892 kt | 1.02 kt | 0.6336 kt | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0.4296 kt | 2.48 kt | 2.05 kt | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 0.2809 kt | 2.06 kt | 1.78 kt | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Guyana or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 0.5092 kt against 0.4885 kt in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Guyana and Ukraine?
- 0.0207 kt, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Ukraine rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Guyana ranks 58th and Ukraine ranks 56th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf