Iraq vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Iraq
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Iraq, a difference of 0.002 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 106th and Mongolia ranks 105th of 214 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2361 kt | 9.23 kt | 9 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.0656 kt | 2.06 kt | 1.99 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.2412 kt | 0.2412 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.002 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Iraq or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Iraq and Mongolia?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Iraq ranks 106th and Mongolia ranks 105th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf