Israel vs Puerto Rico: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Israel
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0222 kt | 0.022 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0008 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Israel or Puerto Rico?
- Israel, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Israel and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Puerto Rico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Puerto Rico rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Israel ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf