Japan vs Syria: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Japan
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 0.1269 kt against 0.1169 kt in Japan, a difference of 0.01 kt.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 91st and Syria ranks 89th of 254 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2958 kt | 0.018 kt | 0.2777 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.254 kt | 0.0189 kt | 0.235 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.2803 kt | 0.0408 kt | 0.2395 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.2705 kt | 0.0485 kt | 0.222 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Japan or Syria?
- Syria, at 0.1269 kt against 0.1169 kt in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Japan and Syria?
- 0.01 kt, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Syria?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Syria rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Japan ranks 91st and Syria ranks 89th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf