Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 106th and Poland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0748 kt | 0.0248 kt | 0.05 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0446 kt | 0.0439 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0112 kt | 0.0112 kt | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0231 kt | 0.0231 kt | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0 kt, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 106th and Poland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf