Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: LULUCF — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
966.93 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
79.02 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

LULUCF — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 966.93 kt against 79.02 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 887.91 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 12.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 1,192 kt 102.86 kt 1,089 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1,017 kt 166.21 kt 850.38 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1,181 kt 176.85 kt 1,004 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1,071 kt 106.1 kt 965.16 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 966.93 kt against 79.02 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
887.91 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: LULUCF — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: LULUCF — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,061 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf