Latvia vs Romania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0025 kt against 0.0025 kt in Romania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Romania ahead.
Latvia ranks 123rd and Romania ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0269 kt | 0.5392 kt | 0.5123 kt | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.0623 kt | 0.1649 kt | 0.1026 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.0097 kt | 0.1788 kt | 0.1691 kt | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.0006 kt | 0.4228 kt | 0.4221 kt | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Latvia or Romania?
- Latvia, at 0.0025 kt against 0.0025 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Latvia and Romania?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 123rd and Romania ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf