Lebanon vs Tajikistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Lebanon
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Lebanon ranks 106th and Tajikistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0115 kt | 0.0096 kt | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0.0031 kt | 0 kt | 0.0031 kt | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Lebanon or Tajikistan?
- Lebanon, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Lebanon and Tajikistan?
- 0 kt, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Tajikistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Lebanon ranks 106th and Tajikistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf