Libya vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Poland
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 119th and Poland ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.025 kt | 0.025 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0446 kt | 0.0446 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0112 kt | 0.0112 kt | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0231 kt | 0.0231 kt | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Poland?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Poland?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 119th and Poland ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf