Libya vs Switzerland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Switzerland
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Switzerland, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 106th and Switzerland ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0031 kt | 0.0031 kt | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0072 kt | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.006 kt | 0.006 kt | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Libya or Switzerland?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Libya and Switzerland?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Switzerland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Switzerland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Libya ranks 106th and Switzerland ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf