Mali vs Serbia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mali
- Serbia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0253 kt | 0.1758 kt | 0.1505 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.021 kt | 0.088 kt | 0.067 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0126 kt | 0.0885 kt | 0.0759 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mali or Serbia?
- Mali, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mali and Serbia?
- 0 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Serbia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mali ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf