Mauritius vs Pakistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mauritius
- Pakistan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 kt | 0.0783 kt | 0.0768 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0675 kt | 0.0675 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0435 kt | 0.0435 kt | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.1293 kt | 0.1293 kt | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mauritius or Pakistan?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mauritius and Pakistan?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Pakistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf