Mauritius vs Puerto Rico: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mauritius
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 kt | 0.0222 kt | 0.0208 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0008 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mauritius or Puerto Rico?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mauritius and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Puerto Rico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Puerto Rico rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf