Mexico vs South Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mexico
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 36.53 kt against 31.48 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 5.05 kt.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Mexico ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 23rd of 254 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.8 kt | 22.86 kt | 7.94 kt | Mexico |
| 2020s | 34.95 kt | 44.04 kt | 9.09 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mexico or South Sudan?
- Mexico, at 36.53 kt against 31.48 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mexico and South Sudan?
- 5.05 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and South Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mexico ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 23rd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf