Mongolia vs Montenegro: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 0.002 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 131st and Montenegro ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7883 kt | 0.0162 kt | 0.7721 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.2412 kt | 0.0655 kt | 0.1756 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.002 kt | 0.0567 kt | 0.0547 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mongolia or Montenegro?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mongolia and Montenegro?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Montenegro rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 131st and Montenegro ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf