Mongolia vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Poland, a difference of 0.002 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 118th and Poland ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.23 kt | 0.025 kt | 9.21 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 2.06 kt | 0.0446 kt | 2.01 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.2412 kt | 0.0112 kt | 0.2299 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.002 kt | 0.0231 kt | 0.0211 kt | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 118th and Poland ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf