Mongolia vs Samoa: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Samoa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Samoa, a difference of 0.002 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 118th and Samoa ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.23 kt | 0.0429 kt | 9.19 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 2.06 kt | 0.0013 kt | 2.05 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.2412 kt | 0.0125 kt | 0.2286 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.002 kt | 0 kt | 0.002 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mongolia or Samoa?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mongolia and Samoa?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 118th and Samoa ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf