Montenegro vs Polynesia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Montenegro
- Polynesia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 119th and Polynesia ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0162 kt | 0 kt | 0.0162 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.0655 kt | 0.0125 kt | 0.053 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0567 kt | 0 kt | 0.0567 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Montenegro or Polynesia?
- Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Montenegro and Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Polynesia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Polynesia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Montenegro ranks 119th and Polynesia ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf