Niger vs Puerto Rico: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Niger
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Niger ahead.
Niger ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.16 kt | 0.0222 kt | 4.14 kt | Niger |
| 2000s | 0.4183 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.4175 kt | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Niger or Puerto Rico?
- Niger, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Niger and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Puerto Rico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Puerto Rico rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Niger ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf