OECD vs Zambia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- OECD
- Zambia
How they compare
OECD currently reports 391.63 kt against 286.25 kt in Zambia, a difference of 105.38 kt.
That makes OECD's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.
OECD ranks 3rd and Zambia ranks 5th of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, OECD averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 379.27 kt | 311.35 kt | 67.92 kt | OECD |
| 2000s | 168.44 kt | 317.83 kt | 149.39 kt | Zambia |
| 2010s | 172.74 kt | 493.38 kt | 320.65 kt | Zambia |
| 2020s | 263.21 kt | 349.34 kt | 86.13 kt | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, OECD or Zambia?
- OECD, at 391.63 kt against 286.25 kt in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between OECD and Zambia?
- 105.38 kt, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD and Zambia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do OECD and Zambia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- OECD ranks 3rd and Zambia ranks 5th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf