Poland vs Slovenia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Poland
- Slovenia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Poland ranks 132nd and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0248 kt | 0.0185 kt | 0.0063 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.0446 kt | 0.0164 kt | 0.0281 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.0112 kt | 0.0247 kt | 0.0135 kt | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0231 kt | 0.0755 kt | 0.0523 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Poland or Slovenia?
- Poland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Poland and Slovenia?
- 0 kt, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Slovenia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Poland ranks 132nd and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf