Slovenia vs Somalia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Slovenia
- Somalia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Somalia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0185 kt | 0.0166 kt | 0.0018 kt | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0164 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0146 kt | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.0247 kt | 0 kt | 0.0247 kt | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0755 kt | 0 kt | 0.0755 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Slovenia or Somalia?
- Slovenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Somalia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Slovenia and Somalia?
- 0 kt, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Somalia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Somalia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Slovenia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf