Slovenia vs Vanuatu: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Slovenia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 132nd and Vanuatu ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 3 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0185 kt | 0.0096 kt | 0.0089 kt | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0164 kt | 0.0082 kt | 0.0082 kt | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.0247 kt | 0.0269 kt | 0.0022 kt | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 0.0755 kt | 0 kt | 0.0755 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Slovenia or Vanuatu?
- Slovenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Vanuatu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Slovenia and Vanuatu?
- 0 kt, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Vanuatu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Vanuatu rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Slovenia ranks 132nd and Vanuatu ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf