Sweden vs Uzbekistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Sweden
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Sweden ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0658 kt | 0.8766 kt | 0.8108 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0068 kt | 0.1445 kt | 0.1376 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.1051 kt | 0 kt | 0.1051 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Sweden or Uzbekistan?
- Sweden, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Sweden and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Uzbekistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Sweden ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf