Austria vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC over time
- Austria
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.9957 kt against 0.9553 kt in Austria, a difference of 0.0404 kt.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Austria ranks 43rd and Poland ranks 41st of 62 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9583 kt | 2.69 kt | 1.73 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.9581 kt | 1.45 kt | 0.4901 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.957 kt | 0.775 kt | 0.182 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc, Austria or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.9957 kt against 0.9553 kt in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc between Austria and Poland?
- 0.0404 kt, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Poland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc?
- Austria ranks 43rd and Poland ranks 41st of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf