Belgium vs Romania: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC over time
- Belgium
- Romania
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.3506 kt against 0.3354 kt in Romania, a difference of 0.0152 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Belgium ranks 49th and Romania ranks 50th of 62 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0028 kt | 0.2408 kt | 0.238 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.3506 kt | 0.295 kt | 0.0556 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc, Belgium or Romania?
- Belgium, at 0.3506 kt against 0.3354 kt in Romania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc between Belgium and Romania?
- 0.0152 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Romania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Belgium and Romania rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc?
- Belgium ranks 49th and Romania ranks 50th of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf