Haiti vs Slovenia: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC over time
- Haiti
- Slovenia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.05 kt against 0.0364 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0136 kt.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.4 times Slovenia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 62 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.05 kt | 0.184 kt | 0.134 kt | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.05 kt | 0.0539 kt | 0.0039 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc, Haiti or Slovenia?
- Haiti, at 0.05 kt against 0.0364 kt in Slovenia as of 2000.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc between Haiti and Slovenia?
- 0.0136 kt, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2000.
- How do Haiti and Slovenia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc?
- Haiti ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf