Kenya vs Turkey: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC over time
- Kenya
- Turkey
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 2.7 kt against 1.93 kt in Turkey, a difference of 0.77 kt.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.4 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 38th and Turkey ranks 40th of 68 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.88 kt | 5.23 kt | 1.65 kt | Kenya |
| 2000s | 2.74 kt | 3.58 kt | 0.8417 kt | Turkey |
| 2010s | 2.7 kt | 0.9265 kt | 1.77 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc, Kenya or Turkey?
- Kenya, at 2.7 kt against 1.93 kt in Turkey as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc between Kenya and Turkey?
- 0.77 kt, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Kenya and Turkey rank globally for lulucf — emissions (ch4) — unfccc?
- Kenya ranks 38th and Turkey ranks 40th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf