Algeria vs Libya: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Algeria
- Libya
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 66 kt against 29.33 kt in Libya, a difference of 36.67 kt.
That makes Algeria's figure about 2.2 times Libya's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 105th of 239 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66 kt | 36.67 kt | 29.33 kt | Algeria |
| 2000s | 69.3 kt | 30.07 kt | 39.23 kt | Algeria |
| 2010s | 70.03 kt | 35.93 kt | 34.1 kt | Algeria |
| 2020s | 66 kt | 31.17 kt | 34.83 kt | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Algeria or Libya?
- Algeria, at 66 kt against 29.33 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Algeria and Libya?
- 36.67 kt, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Libya rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Algeria ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 105th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf