Australia vs Rwanda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -11,102 kt against -11,630 kt in Australia, a difference of 528 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 199th and Rwanda ranks 198th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,084 kt | 2,264 kt | 45,820 kt | Australia |
| 2000s | 59,759 kt | 38.23 kt | 59,721 kt | Australia |
| 2010s | -11,911 kt | -4,553 kt | 7,359 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | -13,160 kt | -10,758 kt | 2,402 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Australia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -11,102 kt against -11,630 kt in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Australia and Rwanda?
- 528 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Australia ranks 199th and Rwanda ranks 198th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf