Austria vs Croatia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports -4,053 kt against -4,788 kt in Austria, a difference of 735 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Austria ranks 231st and Croatia ranks 228th of 257 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11,807 kt | -846.96 kt | 10,960 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | -6,536 kt | -825.86 kt | 5,710 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | -4,893 kt | -2,757 kt | 2,135 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | -4,785 kt | -4,238 kt | 546.33 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Croatia?
- Croatia, at -4,053 kt against -4,788 kt in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Croatia?
- 735 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Croatia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 231st and Croatia ranks 228th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf