Austria vs New Zealand: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- New Zealand
How they compare
Austria currently reports -4,788 kt against -6,052 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 1,264 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 231st and New Zealand ranks 232nd of 257 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11,807 kt | -17,396 kt | 5,589 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | -6,536 kt | -19,055 kt | 12,520 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | -4,893 kt | -16,557 kt | 11,664 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | -4,785 kt | -7,811 kt | 3,026 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or New Zealand?
- Austria, at -4,788 kt against -6,052 kt in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and New Zealand?
- 1,264 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Zealand?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and New Zealand rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 231st and New Zealand ranks 232nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf