Austria vs Romania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Romania
How they compare
Austria currently reports -4,788 kt against -7,346 kt in Romania, a difference of 2,558 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 195th and Romania ranks 197th of 217 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11,807 kt | -14,747 kt | 2,940 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | -6,536 kt | -23,610 kt | 17,074 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | -4,893 kt | -40,181 kt | 35,288 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | -4,785 kt | -16,128 kt | 11,343 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Romania?
- Austria, at -4,788 kt against -7,346 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Romania?
- 2,558 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Romania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Romania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 195th and Romania ranks 197th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf