Azerbaijan vs Congo: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Congo
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports -2,934 kt against -4,048 kt in Congo, a difference of 1,114 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 189th and Congo ranks 191st of 217 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,188 kt | 8,667 kt | 9,854 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | -1,258 kt | 8,503 kt | 9,761 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | -3,259 kt | 13,795 kt | 17,054 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | -3,365 kt | 965.11 kt | 4,330 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Azerbaijan or Congo?
- Azerbaijan, at -2,934 kt against -4,048 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Azerbaijan and Congo?
- 1,114 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Congo rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 189th and Congo ranks 191st of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf