Belarus vs Ghana: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports -55,149 kt against -104,266 kt in Belarus, a difference of 49,117 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ghana ahead.
Belarus ranks 250th and Ghana ranks 248th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -12,533 kt | 18,166 kt | 30,699 kt | Ghana |
| 2000s | -4,905 kt | -9,892 kt | 4,987 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,896 kt | 13,586 kt | 11,690 kt | Ghana |
| 2020s | -78,087 kt | -37,202 kt | 40,885 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Belarus or Ghana?
- Ghana, at -55,149 kt against -104,266 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Belarus and Ghana?
- 49,117 kt, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ghana?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Ghana rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 250th and Ghana ranks 248th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf