Belarus vs India: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- India
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -104,266 kt against -149,609 kt in India, a difference of 45,343 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 212th and India ranks 214th of 217 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -12,533 kt | -222,472 kt | 209,939 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | -4,905 kt | -19,038 kt | 14,134 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,896 kt | -82,796 kt | 84,692 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | -78,087 kt | -143,483 kt | 65,396 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Belarus or India?
- Belarus, at -104,266 kt against -149,609 kt in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Belarus and India?
- 45,343 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and India?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and India rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 212th and India ranks 214th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf