Belarus vs OECD: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- OECD
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -104,266 kt against -115,307 kt in OECD, a difference of 11,041 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 234th and OECD ranks 235th of 239 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -12,533 kt | -978,336 kt | 965,803 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | -4,905 kt | -1.07 million kt | 1.07 million kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,896 kt | -924,397 kt | 926,293 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | -78,087 kt | -227,610 kt | 149,523 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Belarus or OECD?
- Belarus, at -104,266 kt against -115,307 kt in OECD as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Belarus and OECD?
- 11,041 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and OECD?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and OECD rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 234th and OECD ranks 235th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf