Benin vs Ecuador: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Benin
- Ecuador
How they compare
Benin currently reports 12,753 kt against 12,290 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 463 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Benin ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 37th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -4,836 kt | 36,555 kt | 41,391 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 36,037 kt | 29,318 kt | 6,720 kt | Benin |
| 2010s | 28,946 kt | 23,010 kt | 5,936 kt | Benin |
| 2020s | 12,921 kt | 16,494 kt | 3,573 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Benin or Ecuador?
- Benin, at 12,753 kt against 12,290 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Benin and Ecuador?
- 463 kt, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Ecuador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Ecuador rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Benin ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 37th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf