Bulgaria vs Kenya: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Bulgaria
- Kenya
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports -15,382 kt against -15,740 kt in Kenya, a difference of 358 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 238th and Kenya ranks 239th of 257 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -21,834 kt | 10,574 kt | 32,409 kt | Kenya |
| 2000s | -23,443 kt | -4,529 kt | 18,914 kt | Kenya |
| 2010s | -15,932 kt | 1,340 kt | 17,272 kt | Kenya |
| 2020s | -16,206 kt | -13,641 kt | 2,564 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Bulgaria or Kenya?
- Bulgaria, at -15,382 kt against -15,740 kt in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Bulgaria and Kenya?
- 358 kt, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Kenya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Kenya rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Bulgaria ranks 238th and Kenya ranks 239th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf