Bulgaria vs Rwanda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Bulgaria
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -11,102 kt against -15,382 kt in Bulgaria, a difference of 4,280 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 238th and Rwanda ranks 236th of 257 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -21,834 kt | 2,264 kt | 24,098 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | -23,443 kt | 38.23 kt | 23,481 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -15,932 kt | -4,553 kt | 11,380 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | -16,206 kt | -10,758 kt | 5,448 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Bulgaria or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -11,102 kt against -15,382 kt in Bulgaria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Bulgaria and Rwanda?
- 4,280 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Rwanda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Bulgaria ranks 238th and Rwanda ranks 236th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf