Cambodia vs Myanmar: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Cambodia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 70,047 kt against 70,026 kt in Cambodia, a difference of 21 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Cambodia ranks 7th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 257 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,075 kt | 95,936 kt | 90,862 kt | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 4,421 kt | 81,080 kt | 76,659 kt | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 57,558 kt | 71,177 kt | 13,619 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 63,520 kt | 70,046 kt | 6,526 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Cambodia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 70,047 kt against 70,026 kt in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Cambodia and Myanmar?
- 21 kt, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Myanmar?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Myanmar rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Cambodia ranks 7th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf