Chad vs Guinea: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Chad
- Guinea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 20,709 kt against 19,544 kt in Guinea, a difference of 1,165 kt.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.
Chad ranks 32nd and Guinea ranks 34th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,112 kt | 19,581 kt | 13,468 kt | Guinea |
| 2000s | 12,630 kt | 19,537 kt | 6,908 kt | Guinea |
| 2010s | 19,944 kt | 19,548 kt | 396.24 kt | Chad |
| 2020s | 20,709 kt | 19,552 kt | 1,158 kt | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Chad or Guinea?
- Chad, at 20,709 kt against 19,544 kt in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Chad and Guinea?
- 1,165 kt, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guinea?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Guinea rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Chad ranks 32nd and Guinea ranks 34th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf