Chad vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Chad
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 22,193 kt against 20,709 kt in Chad, a difference of 1,484 kt.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 32nd and Mongolia ranks 31st of 239 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,112 kt | 23,407 kt | 17,295 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 12,630 kt | 23,468 kt | 10,838 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19,944 kt | 22,639 kt | 2,695 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 20,709 kt | 22,217 kt | 1,508 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Chad or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 22,193 kt against 20,709 kt in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Chad and Mongolia?
- 1,484 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Chad ranks 32nd and Mongolia ranks 31st of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf