China vs Russia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- China
- Russia
How they compare
China currently reports -835,018 kt against -1.10 million kt in Russia, a difference of 261,892 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 254th and Russia ranks 256th of 257 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -347,242 kt | -1.00 million kt | 656,403 kt | China |
| 2000s | -331,770 kt | -1.10 million kt | 773,129 kt | China |
| 2010s | -721,727 kt | -870,167 kt | 148,440 kt | China |
| 2020s | -835,464 kt | -1.02 million kt | 187,362 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, China or Russia?
- China, at -835,018 kt against -1.10 million kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between China and Russia?
- 261,892 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China and Russia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- China ranks 254th and Russia ranks 256th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf