Congo vs Croatia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Congo currently reports -4,048 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia, a difference of 5 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 191st and Croatia ranks 192nd of 217 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,667 kt | -846.96 kt | 9,514 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 8,503 kt | -825.86 kt | 9,329 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 13,795 kt | -2,757 kt | 16,553 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 965.11 kt | -4,238 kt | 5,203 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Congo or Croatia?
- Congo, at -4,048 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Congo and Croatia?
- 5 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Congo ranks 191st and Croatia ranks 192nd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf