Croatia vs Pakistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -3,498 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia, a difference of 555 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 197th and Pakistan ranks 195th of 222 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -846.96 kt | 2,365 kt | 3,212 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | -825.86 kt | 2,487 kt | 3,313 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | -2,757 kt | 723.06 kt | 3,480 kt | Pakistan |
| 2020s | -4,238 kt | -3,650 kt | 588.22 kt | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Croatia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at -3,498 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Croatia and Pakistan?
- 555 kt, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Pakistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 197th and Pakistan ranks 195th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf