Cuba vs Guatemala: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 5,485 kt against 5,390 kt in Guatemala, a difference of 95 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Cuba ranks 61st and Guatemala ranks 63rd of 257 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6,952 kt | 25,590 kt | 32,542 kt | Guatemala |
| 2000s | -16,588 kt | 19,887 kt | 36,475 kt | Guatemala |
| 2010s | -5,488 kt | 7,662 kt | 13,150 kt | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 2,922 kt | 5,467 kt | 2,545 kt | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Cuba, at 5,485 kt against 5,390 kt in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 95 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 61st and Guatemala ranks 63rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf