Cuba vs Latvia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 6,589 kt against 5,485 kt in Cuba, a difference of 1,104 kt.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 59th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6,952 kt | -10,523 kt | 3,571 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | -16,588 kt | -10,993 kt | 5,595 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | -5,488 kt | -3,258 kt | 2,230 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2,922 kt | 4,464 kt | 1,541 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Cuba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 6,589 kt against 5,485 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Cuba and Latvia?
- 1,104 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 59th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf