Dominica vs Libya: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Dominica
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 29.33 kt against 22 kt in Dominica, a difference of 7.33 kt.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.3 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Dominica ranks 96th and Libya ranks 95th of 217 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.67 kt | 36.67 kt | 22 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 8.07 kt | 30.07 kt | 22 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 35.2 kt | 35.93 kt | 0.7333 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 22 kt | 31.17 kt | 9.17 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Dominica or Libya?
- Libya, at 29.33 kt against 22 kt in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Dominica and Libya?
- 7.33 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Libya rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Dominica ranks 96th and Libya ranks 95th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf