Ecuador vs Guyana: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Guyana
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 12,290 kt against 11,357 kt in Guyana, a difference of 933 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 38th of 217 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,555 kt | 6,175 kt | 30,380 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 29,318 kt | 7,685 kt | 21,632 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 23,010 kt | 13,708 kt | 9,303 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 16,494 kt | 11,706 kt | 4,788 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Ecuador or Guyana?
- Ecuador, at 12,290 kt against 11,357 kt in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Ecuador and Guyana?
- 933 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guyana?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Guyana rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 38th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf